Other Archaeological Sites / The Neolithic of the Levant (500 Page Book Online)
Updated August 16th 2019
Read The Store-City of Pithom and the Route of the Exodus Page (1883) ...
Pithom (Hebrew: פיתום) also called Per-Atum or Heroöpolis or Heroonopolis (Greek Ἡρώων πόλις or Ἡρώ) was an ancient city of Egypt. Multiple references in ancient Greek -- Roman  and Hebrew Bible sources exist for this city but its exact location remains somewhat uncertain. A number of scholars identified it as the later archaeological site of Tell El Maskhuta. Others identified it as the earlier archeological site of Tell El Retabeh. The 10th century Jewish scholar Saadia Gaon identified the place in his Judeo-Arabic translation of the Pentateuch as Faiyum 100 kilometres (62 miles) southwest of Cairo. [WikiPedia]
Tell El Retabeh and Tell El Maskhuta
8 miles west from Tell El Maskhuta is the site of Tell El Retabeh. This is approximately the midpoint of Wadi Tumilat.
Here was found a group of granite statues representing Ramesses II, two inscriptions naming Pr-Itm (Temple of Atum), storehouses and bricks made without straw. So archeologists (wrongly) concluded that this was the site of Pi-Ramesses. The excavations carried on by Naville for the Egypt Exploration Fund uncovered a city wall, a ruined temple and the remains of a series of brick buildings with very thick walls and consisting of rectangular chambers of various sizes opening only at the top and without any entrances to one another.
Some scholars such as Manfred Bietak and Kenneth Kitchen have argued that this was the ancient Pithom. This opinion goes back to the 19th century when Alan Gardiner first identified Pithom with the site of Tell El Retaba and this was later accepted by William Albright  and Kenneth Kitchen. Yet archeological excavations seem to show that Tell El Retaba had been unoccupied during the period when we find monuments relating to a town called Pithom.
The joint Polish-Slovak mission has carried out a systematic research at Tell El Retaba since 2007.
More recent analyses have demonstrated that the designation for the temple of Atum -- pr-itm -- can be found in inscriptions at both sites; both at Tell El Retaba and at Tell El Maskhuta. This seems to demonstrate that the name 'Pithom' was used originally for the earlier site -- Tell El Retaba -- before it was abandoned. And when the newer city of Tel El Maskhuta was built the same name was applied to it as well -- as the temple of Atum was moved to El Maskhuta. Thus in effect 'Pithom' was moved to a new location which phenomenon is attested with some other cities as well such as Migdol [WikiPedia]
by James Hoffmeier (2005)
Page 4 in The Book of Exodus by Roland Edmund Murphy (1960)
Pithom: described by Herodotus (2.158) as being on the canal made partially by Necho (B.C. 610—594) for the purpose of connecting the Nile with the Red Sea. The site was discovered in 1883 by Édouard Naville. Excavating at a spot about 60 miles NE. of Cairo, called, from a red granite monolith of Rameses II, seated between the gods Ra and Etom, which has long existed there, Tell el-Maskhuta, the ‘Mound of the statue,’ M. Naville soon met with inscriptions shewing that the ancient name of the place was P-ctém, the ‘ Abode of Et6m’ (the sun-god of Heliopolis). Proceeding further he found that Pithom was a city forming a square of about 220 yds. each way, enclosed by enormous brick-walls, some 6 yds. thick, con- taining a Temple, and also a number of rectangular chambers, with walls 2 or 3 yds. thick, not communicating with one another, but, like the granaries depicted on the monuments, filled from above, shewing that they were store-chambers (see DAZ. iii. 887, ZA. iii. 3784). Inscriptions found on the spot shewed moreover that it had been founded by Rameses II,—partly, it is probable, as a store-house for supplying provisions to Egyptian armies about to cross the desert, and rtly as a fortress for the protection of the exposed Eastern frontier of Egypt P-et6m was the civil name of the capital of the 8th ‘nome,’ or administrative district, of lower Egypt (Naville, Pithom, ed. 4, 1903, P 6): and the ancient geographical lists describe it as being ‘on the astern frontier of Egypt’ (£8. s.v. PirHom). No notice however was found of the Israelites as its builders.
Footnote 1: The canal started from a little above Bubastis (Pi-beseth) on the Tanitic branch of the Nile: it went Eastwards through the Wady gumiiae (p. 67), till it reached the N. end of Lake Timsab; it then turned to the S., and utilising the waters of Lake Timsab and the Bitter Lakes (see p. 126 f.), reached the Red ea at Klysma (a litlle N. of the modern Suez). It was really the reopening and extension of a canal which had been begun long before by Rameses II. Necho did not complete the canal, as he was warned by an oracle that he was ‘labouring for the foreigner.’ It was completed afterwards by Darius (Hdt), three of whose stelae have been found between Lake Timsah and Suez, one during Napoleon’s expedition in Egypt, and the two others when the present Suez canal was being constructed (cf. Faw Hist. of Bg. ti. 916, 4736.)